Case 3-24 Participatory research practice: case for a method to reduce fishing effort in the capture of grouper
Key words | motivational enhancement, COGEPAS, Joal, grouper (thiof), longline fishing, CRODT, participatory research, motivational clarification |
Context | Participatory research, in which researchers and fishers work together in the field of fisheries resource management, is considered effective for fisheries resource co-management as it clarifies the relationship between resource management activities and the results of these activities, and motivates fishers to implement resource management activities. Within the framework of the JICA COGEPAS project, some participatory research was conducted. One was participatory research conducted in Joal on Petite Côte, to reduce the capture of immature fish in the longline fishery of grouper (‘thiof’). This case study presents the detail of the trial. |
Content | In Joal, immature fish represented 90% of the total grouper catch. It was therefore deemed necessary to reduce the catch of immature fish. First, the target fishers who catch groupers on longlines met and agreed to reduce the catch of immature grouper. As a concrete measure, it was hypothesised that the catch of immature fish could be reduced by changing the current hook size, and participatory research was conducted by CRODT and the fishers to scientifically test this hypothesis. The research showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the length of grouper caught between the standard hook size used at the time (size 10) and the size above (size 8), that it was difficult to protect small grouper by switching to the larger hooks, and the use of size 8 reduced catches more than size 10. In addition, the larger size 6 hook was too large to catch grouper. The results of these tests were shared with the target fishers, and measures to reduce the catch of immature groupers were discussed. It was felt that it was up to the fishers themselves to decide on the content of the resource management. Finally, it was agreed that the number of hooks should be reduced overall and the catch itself reduced by mixing the currently used hook size (size 10) with a larger size (size 8). Therefore, a fisheries resource management measure was proposed to reduce the currently used number of hooks by 10% and to mix 10% of size 8 hooks with the current size 10 hooks. |
Lessons Learned | Although the participatory research did not verify the initial hypothesis that changing the hook size would reduce the catch of immature fish, joint verification tests between researchers and fishers helped the latter understand the research results and to readily accept the resulting fisheries resource management measures. |
Guideline chapter relevant to this case study | Chapter 3 Implementation of resource management measures 3.2 Measures to strengthen the sustainability of resource management 3.2.3 Introduction of measures to enhance motivation(2) Clarify the reason for action |
Situation to which this case study could refer | This case study, which uses participatory research for introducing collaborative resource management, is effective when resource users seek to improve their understanding of the resource condition, understand the rationale for resource management activities, and take steps to develop a resource management plan that they are comfortable with. |
4. Participatory research refers to research activities in which researchers and fishermen cooperate to investigate issues necessary for resource management activities, such as the ecology of species targeted for resource management, in fishing villages or waters near the villages based on research themes, in order to conduct resource management based on scientific evidence, and obtain results.