Case GM-2 Resource co-management through rights delegation: case study of legal framework in Gambian resource co-management
【3. The Gambia】
Key words | legal framework, exclusive fishing rights, delegation of fishing management authority, Special Management Zones, NASCOM (National Sole fisheries Co-management Committee), Sole Co-Management Plan, TRY Oyster Women Association, Oyster and Cockle Co-Management Plan, Exclusive Utilization Rights, UNDP Equator Prize |
Context | How did the Gambian government incorporate the concept and system of resource co-management into its fisheries policy? |
Content | The foundation of collaborative fisheries resource management in The Gambia is based on the 2006 Fisheries Policy, the 2007 Fisheries Act, and the 2008 Fisheries Regulations. The 2007 Fisheries Act granted the Ministry of Fisheries the authority to declare Special Management Areas aimed at community-based fisheries management. It also allowed for the delegation of fisheries management within these Special Management Areas to fisheries organisations. Two practical examples of the application of this system are described below. Management of sole resources Management of oyster resources The TRY Oyster Women Association established a four-month harvesting period from March to June, with the rest of the year designated as a closed season. This initiative, led by a women’s organisation from a marginalized fishing village, represents the first attempt of its kind in Africa, where a grassroots organisation formulated a fisheries resource plan and assumed responsibility for resource management. In recognition of this achievement, the organisation received the UNDP Equator Prize in 2012. |
Lessons Learned | The foundational fisheries organisations for collaborative resource management in Senegal, as introduced in ‘Case 2-2 Case of the CLPA, a fisheries resource management organisation in Senegal’, are as described. Senegal relies on locally embedded CLPAs as the basis for fisheries resource co-management,8 with these CLPAs responsible for determining management rules. In contrast, in The Gambia, the central government first approves the resource co-management plan, designates special management areas, and then designates specific organisations within these special management areas to be entrusted with exclusive resource use rights and resource management responsibilities and authority. This represents a difference in approach between the two countries. |
Guideline chapter relevant to this case study | Chapter 4 Strengthening the role and practical capacity of administration 4.2 Development of a legal framework for resource managementThe legal framework for resource management means that management regulations, such as fishing effort limitation measures implemented by resource management organisations with the support of administrative agencies, are enforceable as laws and ordinances, and that the legal basis (control authority) for monitoring and control activities by resource management organisations based on the ‘resource management plan’ is established. |
Situation to which this case study could refer | Senegal and The Gambia have different frameworks for joint resource management. When neighbouring countries consider a framework for joint resource management or revise their current legal frameworks, the different legal frameworks for joint resource management in Senegal and The Gambia can be used as a reference. |
8. There are two types of CLPAs: ‘occupational’, consisting of a single village, and ‘regional’, consisting of multiple fishing villages. Both manage fisheries in specific areas. They do not devolve nationwide fisheries management authority to fishermen’s organisations, as is the case with the Gambia sole fisheries management.