Case
Case GB-1 Co-management supported by IUCN
【5. Guinea Bissau】
Context | Since 1992, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has been implementing an ambitious program for the conservation and sustainable management of natural resources in coastal areas, financed by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, which ended in 2001. This was the beginning of the co-management process on the Buba River, in response to local fishers’ demand for the protection of the resources and the fisheries administration’s will to avoid the development of conflicts with migrant fishers. The co-management process was facilitated by the State Secretariat for Fisheries, the General Direction for Fisheries – Coastal Delegations – Surveillance Service (FISCAP) and the Centre for Fisheries Applied Research (CIPA). The strategy aims to define and implement mechanisms for the long-term use of fishery resources for the benefit of local populations, combining economic and biological sustainability. |
Content | The implementation of fishing rules and the biological rest period, which prompted a national debate in the Guinea-Bissau Parliament, considering the demands of the ship-owners and fishers of Cacheu, whose initiative is supported by CIPA and DGPA (General Direction of Artisanal Fishing) in order to better understand State devolution and resource management. A biological rest was initiated in three rivers with the fishing communities :
For the month of September to October and the target species is the Barracuda. This is based on a study by the research centre, because from an empirical point of view, they proposed it together with the CIPA agents. They clearly showed that during this period, Barracuda enter the river to reproduce. Accordingly, it was agreed that during this period it is forbidden to fish with gillnets in this area. The results of these measurements are as follows:
With regard to the control of fishing effort within the framework of co-management measures, Guinea-Bissau has adopted the following measures: Reduce the number of motorized pirogues in the co-management zone to 15 and establish fishing zones and rules in these zones. ZONE 1 – Main channel
ZONE 2 – 2nd river
ZONE 3- Secondary inlet.
ZONE 4 : Tertiary inlet
Ban on the river.
Mangrove reforestation Improving value-added products ;
|
Lessons Learned | The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) continued to support co-management for 10 years. Co-management requires a lot of time to set up. Constant support is needed during the start-up phase. |
Guideline chapter relevant to this case study | Chapter 3: Implementation of resource management measures. 3.1 Resource management measures |
Situation to which this case study could refer | This case study is a useful reference for those starting to develop co-management in rivers with specific, well-detailed rules. |